Crypto Fraud: US SEC Sues NovaTech Over Alleged $650 Million Global Crypto Fraud

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday sued the cryptocurrency company NovaTech and its married co-founders, claiming they fraudulently raised more than $650 million from more than 200,000 investors around the world, including many Haitian-Americans.

NovaTech and its co-founders Cynthia and Eddy Petion reportedly promised investors that their money would be safe, with Cynthia Petion assuring that they would “make a profit from day one.”

He SECOND According to the company, the Petions used the new money primarily to repay previous investors and pay fees to promoters, while pocketing millions of dollars for themselves. The scheme lasted four years until NovaTech’s collapse in May 2023.

Monday lawsuit The lawsuit in Miami federal court came two months after New York Attorney General Letitia James sued NovaTech and Petitions in state court in Manhattan, arguing that their fraud for more than a billion dollars.

Regulators said NovaTech attempted to appeal to victims’ religious faith via social media, Telegram and WhatsApp, and sometimes in Haitian Creole, with Cynthia Petion calling herself “Reverend CEO” and saying NovaTech was “God’s vision.”

Lawyers for NovaTech and the Petions, who are believed to live in Panama, could not immediately be identified.

Discover the stories that interest you


Both regulators called the fraud a pyramid scheme, in which companies pay bonuses or commissions to attract new investors. The SEC also charged six NovaTech promoters with fraud, saying they continued to recruit investors despite “red flags” such as delays in withdrawals and regulatory actions in the United States and Canada that raised questions about NovaTech’s legitimacy.

One promoter, Martin Zizi, agreed to pay a $100,000 civil penalty. His attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Both lawsuits seek restitution for victims and civil penalties.

The case is SEC v Nova Tech Ltd, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, No. 24-23058.

Source link

Disclaimer:
The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. We make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the post for any purpose.
We respect the intellectual property rights of content creators. If you are the owner of any material featured on our website and have concerns about its use, please contact us. We are committed to addressing any copyright issues promptly and will remove any material within 2 days of receiving a request from the rightful owner.

Leave a Comment