OpenAI: OpenAI supports California AI bill requiring “watermarking” of synthetic content

ChatGPT Developer Open AI is supporting California bill that would require tech companies to label AI generated contentwhich can range from harmless memes to deepfakes intended to spread misinformation about political candidates.

The bill, called AB 3211It has so far been overshadowed by attention on another California artificial intelligence (AI) bill, SB 1047, which requires AI developers to perform safety testing on some of their own models.

That bill has faced backlash from the tech industry, including Microsoft-backed OpenAI.

According to the state’s legislative database, California state lawmakers attempted to introduce 65 AI-related bills during this legislative season, including measures to ensure all algorithmic decisions are unbiased and to protect the intellectual property of deceased individuals from exploitation by AI companies. Many of the bills are now dead.

San Francisco-based OpenAI believes that for AI-generated content, transparency And provenance requirements like watermarking are important, especially in an election year, according to a letter sent to California State Assembly member Buffy Wicks, who authored the bill.

Elections will be held this year in countries representing a third of the world’s population, and experts are concerned about the role that AI-generated content will play, which has already featured prominently in some elections, such as in Indonesia.

Discover the stories that interest you


“New technologies and standards can help people understand the origin of content they encounter online and avoid confusion between human-generated content and photorealistic AI-generated content,” OpenAI chief strategy officer Jason Kwon wrote in the letter, which was seen by Reuters. AB 3211 has already passed the state Assembly by a vote of 62-0. It was approved by the Senate appropriations committee earlier this month, setting it up for a vote on the floor of the state Senate. If passed before the end of the legislative session on Aug. 31, it would go to Gov. Gavin Newsom to sign or veto by Sept. 30.

Source link

Disclaimer:
The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. We make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the post for any purpose.
We respect the intellectual property rights of content creators. If you are the owner of any material featured on our website and have concerns about its use, please contact us. We are committed to addressing any copyright issues promptly and will remove any material within 2 days of receiving a request from the rightful owner.

Leave a Comment